Graflex.org Forum Index Graflex.org
Get help with your Graflex questions here
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

HYPERFOCAL DISTANCE

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Graflex.org Forum Index -> Speed Graphic Help
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
SYNCHROJAMES



Joined: 12 Jun 2007
Posts: 38
Location: SAN DIEGO CA

PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 6:40 pm    Post subject: HYPERFOCAL DISTANCE Reply with quote

My CG has a 135mm Graflex lens and a 6x7 roll back. Any one out there have an easy way to calculate hyperfocal distance?
Thanks, James
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Henry



Joined: 09 May 2001
Posts: 1650
Location: Allentown, Pennsylvania

PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 7:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, Graphic Graflex Photography, 10th ed., defines hyperfocal distance "as that object distance on which the camera must be correctly focused in order that the far limit of the permissible depth of field shall just reach infinity" (PP. 43-44). This definition is followed by almost three pages of discussion, formulae, illustrative photos, and a table. From the table, I can tell you that, for your 135mm lens, the hyperfocal distances for each lens aperture are as follows: f4.5, 98 ft.; f5.6, 79 ft.; f8, 55 ft.; f11, 40 ft., f16, 28 ft.; f22, 20 ft. What I generally do, if and when I think about it at all, which is seldom, is predicated on the fact that as lens aperture decreases, depth of field increases (i.e., infinity moves "farther away"), therefore after focusing on the subject one can nudge the focus point a tad nearer the lens; the smaller the aperture, the bigger the "tad." If done right, everything on out to just infinity should be acceptably in focus, and objects closer to the lens which were formerly not in focus should now be acceptably in focus. I *think* that's how it works---that's my rule of thumb, FWIW.

Help us out here, gang!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tsgrimm



Joined: 04 Apr 2004
Posts: 158
Location: SE Michigan

PostPosted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 4:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.dofmaster.com/custom.html

This may help. If not, a web search for hyperfocal will bring up more than you may want to know.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Henry



Joined: 09 May 2001
Posts: 1650
Location: Allentown, Pennsylvania

PostPosted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 2:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

To add to my previous post, again from Graphic Graflex Photography, p. 44: following the quoted definition given above is this: "Alternatively, if a camera is correctly focused on infinity,the hyperfocal distance becomes then the nearest distance that is just acceptably in focus....If a lens is correctly focused on its hyperfocal distance, then the far depth of field extends to infinity, as we have seen, and the near depth of field becomes just half the hyperfocal distance." Using the hyperfocal distances for a 135mm lens, as given by the table cited above, those respective near distances, in feet, for each f-stop from f4.5 to f22 would be 49, 39.5, 27.5, 20, 14, 10.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Graflex.org Forum Index -> Speed Graphic Help All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group