| Author | Message |
|---|
aoresteen Joined: 26 May 2004 Posts: 67 |  Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 11:01 pm Post subject: How To Identify Viewfinder Masks
I have a number of viewfinder masks but I didn't see any numbers on them.
1. How do you figure out which masks you have?
I use this reference to match my lens to a mask:
https://www.graflex.org/speed-graphic/viewfinder-masks.html
I also found a list of masks for the roll film holders (RFH) here:
https://web.archive.org/web/20150416201354/http://www.cameraeccentric.com/html/info/graflex_13.html
2. So for a 101mm lens with a 2 1/4 x 3 1/4 rh8 back a 9105-2 mask is listed but the first ref does not list a mask for the 101mm lens. Does that mean that one is not needed?
3. Is the 9105-2 the same mask as the #2 mask listed in the first reference?
Thanks! |
|
Sirius Glass Joined: 06 Jun 2010 Posts: 162 |  Posted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 11:54 pm
I have been looking for a 9105-9 mask. Do you have one to sell? |
|
Henry Joined: 09 May 2001 Posts: 1662 |  Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 10:35 am
Tony, I'd go with the printed mask data you posted from the Graflex company literature, in preference to the info from that page on this site. On my no. 2 mask, the number "2" is stamped into the metal on the upper back inside (facing the finder optics) edge of the mask, under the flange along the top of the mask. I don't know what it means when the number is missing: after-market item, factory omission, or what? |
|
aoresteen Joined: 26 May 2004 Posts: 67 |  Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 3:43 pm
Henry,
Thanks for the info. Using a magnifier I was able to find the numbers that are stamped in my masks. Turns out I had one #4 and two #2 masks.
Sirius Glass, no #9. Sorry! |
|
aoresteen Joined: 26 May 2004 Posts: 67 |  Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 3:46 pm
|
|
Henry Joined: 09 May 2001 Posts: 1662 |  Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2015 9:24 pm
Apparently, Graflex didn't distinguish between 6x7 and 6x9 formats in their mask production. My no. 2 mask is proportioned for 6x9, but I always shoot 6x7. Just one more reason that I've called the optical finder only an approximation of what the film sees. |
|