| Author | Message |
|---|
SYNCHROJAMES Joined: 12 Jun 2007 Posts: 38 |  Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 4:05 am Post subject: Voltage/Current thru shutter
I have an odd question-does anyone out there know what the maximum voltage/current can be sent through the contacts in the shutter? I have a 135mm optar in a Graphex shutter with x-sync only. I ask this because I was trying to come up with a way to have electric bulb/strobe flash that would mimic the 20ms burn time of a flash bulb, giving the best[I hope] of both types.
thanks
 |
|
Dan Fromm Joined: 14 May 2001 Posts: 2165 |  Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 4:30 pm
Trigger voltage and current have nothing to do with an electronic flash's burn time. "Studio" flashes have longer burn times than most portables, check the manufacturers' specs. FWIW, the longest duration portable I'm aware of is the Agfatronic 643; its burn time at full power is 1/200th, considerably faster than you want. |
|
glennfromwy Joined: 29 Nov 2001 Posts: 903 |  Posted: Sun Sep 13, 2009 10:40 pm
The contacts can generally survive 50 volts DC. It's the amperage that can weld the contacts together or burn them to a crisp. Flash bulbs draw an average of 1 1/2 amps per each, if memory serves. You could flash a half dozen bulbs with the shutter sync using 3 "D" cells, and that's pushing it. More than that would generally involve the use of a larger battery, controlled through a small relay which was tripped by the shutter and a separate small battery. |
|
SYNCHROJAMES Joined: 12 Jun 2007 Posts: 38 |  Posted: Thu Nov 26, 2009 11:10 pm
I finally tested my concept for flash bulb replacement. Good news/bad news. I made a holder for a 14v bulb that popped in just like a flash bulb. It functioned fine, and with five 9v batteries in series for 45v, it put out what I thought would be adequate light. Using my recently acquired Heiland adjustable flash head set to far, a 2sec exposure at f4.7 produced a usable image slightly smaller than a quarter in the middle of a 6x7 neg. Not even close to a press 25, or even my Strobonar. Oh well, it was a fun learning experience and I still have a good stock of clear 25's. Happy Turkey day to all.
James |
|
glennfromwy Joined: 29 Nov 2001 Posts: 903 |  Posted: Fri Nov 27, 2009 8:15 pm
If you're only getting a small spot on the negative, I sounds to me like the flash is out of sync. If it was in sync and didn't make enough light, you would have an evenly under exposed negative. It's firing with the shutter blades only partially open. I don't think there's any way you can get electronic flash to sync the way you're doing it. It must fire at the instant the blades are fully open. It's much too fast to do that with a 20ms delay except at very slow shutter speeds. The recommended time for using elec flash with bulb synced shutters is 1/5 second or slower. |
|
pv17vv Joined: 22 Dec 2001 Posts: 255 |  Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2009 5:44 pm
Glenn, | Quote: | | You could flash a half dozen bulbs with the shutter sync using 3 "D" cells, and that's pushing it. |
How did Weegee's colleagues manage to keep-on shooting on long-duration assignments then ? Left pocket full of bulbs and right pocket full of "D" cells ?
Georges |
|
glennfromwy Joined: 29 Nov 2001 Posts: 903 |  Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2009 8:07 pm
Georges, I think you misunderstand. Six bulbs at once, not six flashes. Two fresh D cells barely have enough power to fire six at once reliably and a setup like that would normally be confined to studio work. Using one bulb at a time the batteries will last a while. The zinc-carbon batteries of the day didn't last near as long as today's batteries, though. They did carry spares in their case. |
|
pv17vv Joined: 22 Dec 2001 Posts: 255 |  Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 5:05 pm
Thanks Glenn ! |
|
SYNCHROJAMES Joined: 12 Jun 2007 Posts: 38 |  Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 8:08 pm
Glenn
Actually I used the bulb setting and a 2 sec exposure-the flash synch worked fine with the rest of my test, both with bulbs and strobe.
James |
|
SYNCHROJAMES Joined: 12 Jun 2007 Posts: 38 |  Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 8:14 pm
OOPS!
I forgot to mention-my lens has only the X-synch setting.
James |
|
glennfromwy Joined: 29 Nov 2001 Posts: 903 |  Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:09 am
Ah, good. With a 2 second exposure it doesn't require much in the way of synchronization. You could actually hold the flash in your hand and set it off manually at that speed. Have fun! |
|