
Posted: Tue Feb 22, 2005 7:50 pm
I was just playing with a new 12 inch Dagor. I searched out his lens because it was supposed to be good, supposed to be convertible, and was made about the same year as my camera. How could I pass it up?
But it brought up the question (for me anyway) about f-stops when converted. Of course the Dagor doesn't have a dual scale like my officially convertible lenses, which I never gave much thought.
After a quick test, I found the lens to be approximately 11 1/2 inches, and just over 23 inches with the front cell removed. That made me think of f-stops since there's no scale...
Here's my 'problem'...
Essentially going through the same lens but with twice the bellows draw is about the same as using a non-converted lens at a 1:1 mag ratio. That's 2 extra stops. Easy and makes sense... But... I'm only using half the lens! My thought would be that there should be more light getting through. So say 1 1/2 stops added when converted (rough guess).
That made sense till I looked at my other officially convertibles. On average, they add 2 1/2 stops when doubling the focal length with a cell removed. So they account for a 1/2 stop _less_ light hitting the film when using half the lens... That doesn't make sense to me...
So, as usual, here's the questions:
Is there any formula that would calc f-stops for a converted lens?
And does anyone know why there's a half stop less light hitting the film when going through half the lens elements?
I hope all that made snse? And yes I can measure the light falling on the GG to make a dual scale, but (again)... After checking the scale I made for a lens I swapped shutters, My scale for the double focal length is only about 1 1/8 stops over the normal focal length... Somthin wrong there... I'll have to do two lenses now