| Author | Message |
|---|
rakuhito Joined: 05 Sep 2004 Posts: 4 |  Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2004 10:06 am
i'm new to large format photography - i've read all the faqs i could find around the internet, but just wanted to throw out this possibly probobly simple dumb question:
i'm currently looking around on e-bay for some used lenses to use on a crown graphic, for example:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=3838027685&ssPageName=STRK:MEWA:IT
am i correct that if, for example, if i buy this lens, then i must next also purchase/find a graflex lens board to fit it into. and then what? exactly?
thanks. |
|
jsiladi Joined: 20 Aug 2004 Posts: 34 |  Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2004 12:35 pm
What you are looking at in that a-u-c-t-i-o-n is a Convertable lens.. The front element is removed to get the second focal length (370mm if I'm reading it right). If you have an anniversary model graflex (probably not), you can make a lens board of your own. Pacemaker type you may need to find a lens board (show up on the bay all the time). Someone here may have what you need too.. Other concerns will be if the shutter is working at all speeds, particularly the slow speeds (1 second, etc). Also, you'll want to make sure the lens comes with a retaining ring to hold it TO the lens board. They can be more of a pain to find than the lens boards.. If you need further help, feel free to ask..  Jeff.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: jsiladi on 2004-09-05 05:37 ]</font> |
|
Rangemaster Joined: 06 Jul 2001 Posts: 412 |  Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2004 1:14 pm
I don't see any indication of this being a convertable, usually when it is a covertable, especially on a Schneider, there will be a duel focal length and f/stop listed on the front of the lens, this particular lens can produce good results and has been a standard for several years now, this one on this link looks like it has been well used, if the shutter has been serviced, I would suspect the black dots listed in the listing would not really affect optical performance, and if needed could be cleaned by the right person, I have had a 210 for a long time and never been unhappy with the results and for the price he has it starting at, it could be a real good bargin.
Dave
|
|
Rangemaster Joined: 06 Jul 2001 Posts: 412 |  Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2004 1:18 pm
Forgot to add, yes it looks as if you would have to purchase a lens board for it, not a big deal, I have seen them on there for 10-20 in looking at the pictures the retaining ring does seem to be present, if you look at the picture of the rear element showing the black spots, you can see the ring with two holes in it, right in front of the rear element.
Dave
|
|
Nick Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 494 |  Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2004 1:28 pm
The second focal length is in green. |
|
Rangemaster Joined: 06 Jul 2001 Posts: 412 |  Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2004 1:39 pm
Okay, now I see it, I did not see it at first glance....sorry, early in the morning and have not had my coffee yet! besides dreading the long day of shooting a wedding....(c:>
Dave
|
|
rakuhito Joined: 05 Sep 2004 Posts: 4 |  Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2004 1:46 pm
wow. you guys are fast with the replies.
okay --- so if the lens has the retaining ring and i get a lensboard, all i have to do is stick the lens through the board and screw it into place with the retaining ring?
would the lens board need a particular size hole? |
|
Rangemaster Joined: 06 Jul 2001 Posts: 412 |  Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2004 1:49 pm
Yup, alls you would need is a board that is drilled for this size shutter, mount it securely and you would/should be ready to shoot...I am sure someone here knows the size, it escapes me at the moment, if you found a board with a smaller sized hole it could be enlarged to accomidate this shutter.
Dave
|
|
disemjg Joined: 10 Jan 2002 Posts: 474 |  Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2004 1:56 pm
If the price is right, by all means buy it. Take note, however, of that battered rim on the rear cell. These old Symmars frequently need to be taken apart to clean out haze and other age related debris (such as the black spots, which may be paint flecks). It may not be possible to disassemble the rear cell with the rim that badly dented up.
Yes, the lensboard you obtain must have a properly sized hole to accept the lens. You can get Pacemaker lensboards, drilled to the correct size, from Midwest photo. They cost about $40. |
|
45PSS Joined: 28 Sep 2001 Posts: 4081 |  Posted: Mon Sep 06, 2004 1:41 am
<font size=+2><font color=dark red>Walk away from this one!</font></font> The rear is bent just enough to cause focusing problems, one side sharp the other soft. Don't bid much if you want the front cell and/or shutter.
_________________
While a picture may be worth a thousand words, a quality photograph is worth a million.
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: 45PSS on 2004-09-05 18:43 ]</font> |
|
jsiladi Joined: 20 Aug 2004 Posts: 34 |  Posted: Mon Sep 06, 2004 4:49 am
I can see some seperation beginning on the rear element.. Looks like something screwy going on with the front one as well where there's a lot of paint missing (chipped?)..
On a general note, Why would a bent ring cause focus issues (other than the possibility of seperation)??
It's in pretty rough condition, granted, and I wouldn't pay more than about $40 for it.. Nice ones can be had in the $150 - $250 range.
The shutter is probably a #1 size..
By the way, I don't see a retaining ring on that particular lens.. I think what you are seeing is the aperature operation ring..
 Jeff
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: jsiladi on 2004-09-05 21:53 ]</font> |
|
Rangemaster Joined: 06 Jul 2001 Posts: 412 |  Posted: Mon Sep 06, 2004 5:16 am
I would say that the area I have added to this picture looks a lot like lens retaining ring mount holes, at least it looks like the one that I have from the rear.
http://www.rockymtnfoto.com/lens.jpg
Dave
|
|
Rangemaster Joined: 06 Jul 2001 Posts: 412 |  Posted: Mon Sep 06, 2004 5:24 am
After playing with the picture a bit in my enhancement program, I could be wrong, it looks as if there is a screw in the right hand hole on the back of the shutter, so perhaps, there is no ring, I would definately write the seller and ask, if there is not, then if could be a real pain to find one...
Dave
|
|
rakuhito Joined: 05 Sep 2004 Posts: 4 |  Posted: Mon Sep 06, 2004 10:19 am
my interest is really in "bad" lenses -- though of course i need it to fit on the camera and work enough that i can get some pictures.
so when looking around on ebay, how does one tell if these lenses are usable? -- ask the seller if the retaining ring is included?
what else is important to ask? |
|
Nick Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 494 |  Posted: Mon Sep 06, 2004 11:44 am
A retaining ring is nice but if the price was right and the lens interesting I'd spend the money on getting a ring from somebody else. You just need to take that extra $$$ into account.
What matters?
Is the shutter in good shape? If not how bad? Add the cost of at least a CLA if you're worried at all.
Are the lens elements in good shape? Fungus? Scratches? Both are bad. How bad depends on the price.
Then you've got the worries with non-camera sellers. I've seen lenses with only one element. Or other problems.
But everything depends on price. You can go to any of the good retailers and get a used lens for a certain amount. Any issues with a lens should lower the price you're willing to pay. |
|