| Author | Message |
|---|
Dave Joined: 05 Dec 2003 Posts: 78 |  Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2004 2:42 am
http://cgi.ebay.ca/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3804035713&category=30075
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Dave on 2004-03-20 18:43 ]</font> |
|
t.r.sanford Joined: 10 Nov 2003 Posts: 812 |  Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2004 4:24 am
My guess is that it is a "Rotelar." I got an f:6.5 270mm. "Rotelar" from Olden Camera & Lens about 20 years ago; they also had an f:4.5 180mm. (both in "Compur" shutters). They said these lenses originally were made for the Graflex "XL." It seems not unlikely that some were rebadged with the Graflex "Tele-Optar" brand. |
|
Nick Joined: 16 Oct 2002 Posts: 494 |  Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2004 1:08 pm
Do they have rear elements? |
|
t.r.sanford Joined: 10 Nov 2003 Posts: 812 |  Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2004 1:17 pm
Mine do, yes. |
|
Dan Fromm Joined: 14 May 2001 Posts: 2165 |  Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2004 1:20 pm
| Quote: |
On 2004-03-20 20:24, t.r.sanford wrote:
My guess is that it is a "Rotelar." I got an f:6.5 270mm. "Rotelar" from Olden Camera & Lens about 20 years ago; they also had an f:4.5 180mm. (both in "Compur" shutters). They said these lenses originally were made for the Graflex "XL." It seems not unlikely that some were rebadged with the Graflex "Tele-Optar" brand.
|
Does yours have a diaphragm? What's on offer looks much like a front cell. I can't see a diaphragm ring on it. |
|
t.r.sanford Joined: 10 Nov 2003 Posts: 812 |  Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2004 5:23 pm
I didn't see a photo on the eBay offer, but perhaps I didn't wait long enough for it to load. The "Rotelars" I got from Olden were complete: front and rear cells, and a "Synchro Compur" shutter in between, with diaphragm.
If the listing is for a front cell only, I still think it might be a "Rotelar," or half of a "Rotelar." |
|
t.r.sanford Joined: 10 Nov 2003 Posts: 812 |  Posted: Sun Mar 21, 2004 5:44 pm
...I went back and let the pix load. It sure looks like the front cell of my "Rotelar," even to the chromed front flange. I have the feeling that the seller doesn't know what it is, either! |
|
Dave Joined: 05 Dec 2003 Posts: 78 |  Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2004 8:19 am
Thanks for the learned replies. I was thinking along the same lines-- thought it looked like an incomplete lens, although I didn't know what it was from. Nice paperweight anyway.
|
|