Graflex.org
Get help with your Graflex questions here

CD of modifications to a Speed Graphic re: reversing back
Graflex.org Forum Index -> Speed Graphic Help
AuthorMessage
gerhard
Joined: 07 Apr 2003
Posts: 6
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2003 4:50 am

Our company is doing market research to see whether there is interest in a CD which would include photos/diagrams of how to modify your speed Graphic back to facilitate a wider range of movements. Other modifications would also be included. The CD would be available for $24.95 US + shipping costs. Please post here if you would be interested in this product.Sorry guys, as my subject I included it as a reversing back, but not in the message. The back would initially only work with 75mm lenses and up but I plan to also produce plastic recessed lens boards so I can use my 65mm Super Angulon. Actually I tried my 65mm lens last night and it focusses to 4.5 feet which is the hyperfocal length for f22. So it will work.Thanks for your interest.

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: gerhard on 2003-04-09 19:52 ]</font>

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: gerhard on 2003-04-12 12:23 ]</font>
Les
Joined: 09 May 2001
Posts: 2682
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2003 12:26 pm

This might fall in the *******/want catagory but since
1. your asking only for information (opinion)
2. it's directly related to Graphic cameras

and

3. I'm curious too. :smile:

I'll allow it.

Moderator
Henry
Joined: 09 May 2001
Posts: 1662
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2003 6:19 pm

A professional photographer friend of mine, Randy Bye, modifies 2x3 Crown Graphic bodies so as to end up with a revolving back (i.e., from horizontal to vertical only). It involves a bit of precise carpentry work, but the end result is perfect for his needs. Randy does a lot of house interiors; he uses modern (i.e., expensive) lenses, some of which are mounted off-center on the lensboard to augment the limited movements on the Crown. He uses 120 roll film exclusively.

I haven't addressed your question at all, but just thought I'd throw this in here FWIW.

Unfortunately for me, this modification probably would be impractical on a Century.
worldphoto
Joined: 05 Feb 2003
Posts: 199
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2003 3:32 am

You said to post if interested.... so I'm not posting.
Harry
FrankS
Joined: 28 Jan 2003
Posts: 27
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2003 12:00 pm

Gerhard,

I think maybe the reason you are not getting overwhelmingly positive responses here is because this forum is all about helping fellow Graphic users unselfishly and not for profit.

Frank Scheitrowsky
RichS
Joined: 18 Oct 2001
Posts: 1468
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2003 5:30 pm

Besides selling these mods, there may be other reasons for no overwhelming responses. He specifically mentions modifying the _back_ of the camera. This would mean some drastic mods that would undoubtedly be non-reversible and otherwise ruin a collectable camera.
I would not want to chop up any of my Graphics no matter what movements it afforded me. And we all already know of the simple mod to the front standard for forward tilt. Most of us don't need any more. And if we do, there's the view camera!
Perhaps a better explanation of these mods would help?
Henry
Joined: 09 May 2001
Posts: 1662
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2003 6:21 pm

Yes, my friend's modification of his Crown backs is definitely "irreversible" (ouch! pun intended).
gerhard
Joined: 07 Apr 2003
Posts: 6
PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2003 3:03 am

Quote:

On 2003-04-09 10:30, RichS wrote:
Besides selling these mods, there may be other reasons for no overwhelming responses. He specifically mentions modifying the _back_ of the camera. This would mean some drastic mods that would undoubtedly be non-reversible and otherwise ruin a collectable camera.
I would not want to chop up any of my Graphics no matter what movements it afforded me. And we all already know of the simple mod to the front standard for forward tilt. Most of us don't need any more. And if we do, there's the view camera!
Perhaps a better explanation of these mods would help?

This is the addition of a simple reversing back, my original is still in tact. It uses your existing back.I know how you feel, using these cameras is like using a Historical icon. Regards.
gerhard
Joined: 07 Apr 2003
Posts: 6
PostPosted: Thu Apr 10, 2003 3:07 am

Quote:

On 2003-04-09 11:21, Henry wrote:
Yes, my friend's modification of his Crown backs is definitely "irreversible" (ouch! pun intended).
This is a reversing back which is an add on that uses your existing back. So it could be taken off any time and the camera could be turned back to it's original condition. Regards.
All times are GMT