Pacemaker Speed Graphic #4474xx
I think it might be 1949 because the F.P. shutter reads 1/100 sec. instead of 1/125.
Gandolph, could you please check your lists? Thanks!

_________________
...preferring to be on the shiny side of the film, Frank S.

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: FrankS on 2003-01-29 07:46 ]</font>

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: FrankS on 2003-01-29 08:49 ]</font>

1947

1947? Awesome! Thanks, Gandolf.
It amazes me to think that a 56 year old camera can outperform any brand new digital wunderkamera of today, regardless of price. On top of that, I can predict with 100% accurracy how many of today's digital marvels will still be producing photographs in 50 years: zero.

_________________
...preferring to be on the shiny side of the film, Frank S.

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: FrankS on 2003-01-30 16:05 ]</font>