Graflex.org
Get help with your Graflex questions here

Tripods?
Graflex.org Forum Index -> Large Format Photography
AuthorMessage
Nick
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 494
PostPosted: Sun Nov 10, 2002 9:37 pm

Could I get a feeling on how bad a tripod is good enough? I'm looking at Velbon Sherpa 750. [Called Efl chaser 4 in the US. I think] It's a reasonable price and I think more then good enough for everything but the view camera. Will it survie under the View I? Or how about the calumet 401 I'm getting? If it's not strong enough anything else in a similar price range that isn't too much heavier?
Thanks
Les
Joined: 09 May 2001
Posts: 2682
PostPosted: Mon Nov 11, 2002 10:47 pm

I've never heard of either of these tripods and I can't find a photo of the Calumet on their site.
Nick
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 494
PostPosted: Tue Nov 12, 2002 1:43 am

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/product/139172/VECEFL4A/REG/2636

That's the tripod. Supposedly able to handle 12lbs.

The Calumet 401 is the long version of the 400 series. I think they stopped making them in 1980 but the one I'm supposed to get is older. The way I understand the history it's the same camera that Kodak sold under the MasterView name and that B&J sold under the Orbit name. 4x5.
hellerharris
Joined: 27 Jun 2002
Posts: 46
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2002 3:08 am

I bought a set of Calumet Lightpro legs, which they're clearing out at $99.00, down from $229.00. Don't know if they're up to pro use, but they seem sturdy and are guaranteed. They are more than enough for my Century with a very heavy Tele-Arton f/4.

Also - I discovered that British camera shops have been selling the Giottos MH1000 ball head for about half of the US price. Even with shipping, it's still much cheaper that buying anywhere here.


________
Suzuki Burgman history
Nick
Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 494
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2002 4:59 pm

I ended up bringing the camera with me to the store. Figured better any problems show up before I buy it. It's acutally fine with the weight of view camera. The camera is high enough that I don't need to extend the whole leg which I guess helps. With the lousy weather I haven't been able to take it outside so that's the real test. It isn't fancy but seems to do what I need.
Les
Joined: 09 May 2001
Posts: 2682
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2002 5:28 pm

The specs look good to me. I always find I want the camera at just above head hight and with the specs saying it goes to 5 feet, that's good enough.

Good luck. I expect a report by spring. :smile:
Frost
Joined: 15 Aug 2002
Posts: 18
PostPosted: Sun Nov 17, 2002 12:43 pm

I use a TiltAll tripod that I bought back in 1985 (thereababouts. A good friend of mine that had ALL kinds of photo equipment, including the Calumet view used a Majestic tripod, and it was a real sturdy setup. I seem to get along with my Tiltall with no problem on a Graflex View II and my Crown 4X5.
Dan Fromm
Joined: 14 May 2001
Posts: 2165
PostPosted: Sun Nov 17, 2002 4:01 pm

Quote:

On 2002-11-17 04:43, Frost wrote:
I use a TiltAll tripod that I bought back in 1985 (thereababouts. A good friend of mine that had ALL kinds of photo equipment, including the Calumet view used a Majestic tripod, and it was a real sturdy setup. I seem to get along with my Tiltall with no problem on a Graflex View II and my Crown 4X5.

Um, I have a Star-D D26 (imitation TiltAll, seems to have come from the same machine shop) bought in 1978 that differs from real TiltAlls of that vintage only in having plastic on metal, not solid metal, knobs. I've found it problematic with long lenses. Two problems, not steady enough AND really clamping down shifts the point of aim a little. This last is a real problem with a 700 mm lens. IMO, TiltAlls and clones are much overrated.

Cheers,

Dan
All times are GMT