| Author | Message |
|---|
Karl Knize Joined: 13 Sep 2002 Posts: 2 |  Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2002 11:57 pm
I'm a working photographer, new to this forum, interested in a home portrait camera that's usable, or restorable. I've come across a 5x7 Home Portrait, in horrible conditon, with all of its parts. Can these be put back into working order? The rear curtain is shot. Can it be restored? I'm looking for a camera to use for portrait work with my 250mm Rodenstock Imagon. Any suggestions? |
|
bertsaunders Joined: 20 May 2001 Posts: 577 |  Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2002 2:42 am
Nothing special about a Home Portrait Graflex, except they are very rarely found anymore! Just so happens to be one on Ebay this week, in rough shape however!
Item #1380647946! The one feature on the Home Portrait was the view camera style lensboard tilt feature, but would suggest that a Revolving back 4x5 Auto Graflex might serve your purpose as well, long bellows/drop bed >>3 3/4" sq<< interchangable lensbd, 1 to 1 copy capability! Bert |
|
Karl Knize Joined: 13 Sep 2002 Posts: 2 |  Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2002 5:20 pm
Thanks Bert! I had a conversation with Fred Lustig last night, a very nice and knowledgeable man, and it would seem
I'm at an end in terms of a Graflex solution for my needs, unless I were to do some extensive modifications to a Super D. I've actually used a Super D, but don't feel that the standard focal length is a true portrait length for 4x5. And of course, it's not a meniscus style lens like the Imagon. As I'm sure you're aware of, the Imagon is a bear to work with at F7.7 on my Deardorff, but the results are terrific.
I know almost nothing about Graflex cameras in total, and didn't know until last night that all of the models like the Super D and Home portrait incorporate an auto diaphram lens design, not just some of them. All I'm looking for, basically, is the opportunity to focus and preview through a mirror to work more quickly and accurately. In all honesty, I think this is going to lead me to a TLR design, either something from Peter Gowland or something I make up custom. The Gowlandflex is perfect for my needs, but will require a secon Imagon, perhaps in barrel if the lens board is a squeeze due to the Copal #3, or perhaps not at all if the lenses are simply too big. If you're the kind of technician who could modify and existing camera, or help me design one from scratch, of know of one, please let me know! Fred Lustig seems to be pretty busy right now.
My regards,
Karl Knize (Nize)
Chicago |
|
Les Joined: 09 May 2001 Posts: 2682 |  Posted: Sat Sep 14, 2002 7:17 pm
I know almost nothing about Graflex cameras in total, and didn't know until last night that all of the models like the Super D and Home portrait incorporate an auto diaphram lens design, not just some of them.
THEY DON"T. Only the Super D incorporates a semi auto diaphragm. Bert's right an RB Auto is your best bet. It has a l o n g bellows and a large front lensboard to handle the size of an Imagon. You might want to look at other portrait lenses like the Cooke 10"-18' , the Unar 10"-19"and the 12" wollensak
|
|
bertsaunders Joined: 20 May 2001 Posts: 577 |  Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2002 6:08 am
>Only< the Super D used the semi-auto lenses as standard, but can also use a variety of lenses on the removable lensboard, >>BUT, it has no lens standard movements!<< The alternate cameras you mentioned, are nice cameras, but in my opinion, a TLR is no match for a Graflex SLR, the mirror focusing is truly a marvel to use! Any format camera has it's drawbacks, have never used a camera that had all the features I wanted, so if you want the perfect camera, you will have to build your own, or modify one!
There are a many ways to modify to suit your purposes, email me at
bsaunders1@bak.rr.com
and lets kick some ideas around! Bert |
|