| 
 
	
		| View previous topic :: View next topic |  
		| Author | Message |  
		| ascex 
 
 
 Joined: 27 Mar 2002
 Posts: 22
 Location: united kingdom
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2004 10:41 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| questioned aimed at Dan Fromm ,what do you reckon the coverage is of 4" tth and 4" supersix  wide open  and say F4-I have both these but dont have mounting rings so have only tried rather rudimentry methods at defining coverage 6x7? regards
 |  |  
		| Back to top |  |  
		|  |  
		| Dan Fromm 
 
 
 Joined: 14 May 2001
 Posts: 2159
 Location: New Jersey
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2004 2:09 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | Quote: |  	  | On 2004-03-24 14:41, ascex wrote:
 questioned aimed at Dan Fromm ,what do you reckon the coverage is of 4" tth and 4" supersix  wide open  and say F4-I have both these but dont have mounting rings so have only tried rather rudimentry methods at defining coverage 6x7?
 regards
 
 | 
 |  |  
		| Back to top |  |  
		|  |  
		| Dan Fromm 
 
 
 Joined: 14 May 2001
 Posts: 2159
 Location: New Jersey
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2004 2:11 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| They are both normal lenses for 2.25 x 3.25.  As I've told you, my TTH 4/2.0 covers 2x3 wide open although it isn't as sharp wide open as I want it to be.  2.25" x 3.25" is the actual size of nominal 6x9. 	  | Quote: |  	  | On 2004-03-24 14:41, ascex wrote:
 questioned aimed at Dan Fromm ,what do you reckon the coverage is of 4" tth and 4" supersix  wide open  and say F4-I have both these but dont have mounting rings so have only tried rather rudimentry methods at defining coverage 6x7?
 regards
 
 | 
 
 Cheers,
 
 Dan
 |  |  
		| Back to top |  |  
		|  |  
		| ascex 
 
 
 Joined: 27 Mar 2002
 Posts: 22
 Location: united kingdom
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2004 11:02 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| sorry didnt see your reply earlier, I assume  my lens came from an Vinten aerial camera as it has extra locking screws,
 its actually marked as a 4" f2 anastigmat with 2.25 x 2.25 marked on the front bezel-
 the lens was from a lot of lenses owned by an old man who lived in a room full of every
 conceiveable lens; mostly dismantled or damaged in some way, he had been collecting
 these for 30 +years --he had quite a few aero ektars unders his bed
  or at least near ,I never met him , but have bought quite a few interesting finds from
 those dealing with his estate-I went to look at a 54 enlarger there-but it was
 incomplete
  . youve encouraged me to try and mount the lens more properly on my speed
 as previously a wobbly piece of cardboard and an offset 405 polariod didnt
 prove reliable ,I might have to machine up a recessed board-same goes for the 4" supersix
 which is in an odd focussing mount-
 -one lens I have adapted is a 10" 2.8 coated projection lens (petzval)
 gives an interesting look
 thanks again for your response
 |  |  
		| Back to top |  |  
		|  |  
		| Dan Fromm 
 
 
 Joined: 14 May 2001
 Posts: 2159
 Location: New Jersey
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2004 5:27 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Here's one, http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3807193946&category=30075 	  | Quote: |  	  | On 2004-03-27 03:02, ascex wrote:
 sorry didnt see your reply earlier,
 I assume  my lens came from an Vinten aerial camera as it has extra locking screws,
 its actually marked as a 4" f2 anastigmat with 2.25 x 2.25 marked on the front bezel-
 the lens was from a lot of lenses owned by an old man who lived in a room full of every
 conceiveable lens; mostly dismantled or damaged in some way, he had been collecting
 these for 30 +years --he had quite a few aero ektars unders his bed
  or at least near ,I never met him , but have bought quite a few interesting finds from
 those dealing with his estate-I went to look at a 54 enlarger there-but it was
 incomplete
  . youve encouraged me to try and mount the lens more properly on my speed
 as previously a wobbly piece of cardboard and an offset 405 polariod didnt
 prove reliable ,I might have to machine up a recessed board-same goes for the 4" supersix
 which is in an odd focussing mount-
 -one lens I have adapted is a 10" 2.8 coated projection lens (petzval)
 gives an interesting look
 thanks again for your response
 
 | 
 I expect you'll find it familiar except for the Bronica S focusing mount.
 
 Astonishing bidding war over it.  I'm slightly acquainted with "nipponia-nipon," a very serious person indeed.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Dan
 |  |  
		| Back to top |  |  
		|  |  
		| ascex 
 
 
 Joined: 27 Mar 2002
 Posts: 22
 Location: united kingdom
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2004 10:22 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| I'd better fit mine into a bronica focusing mount then  ,maybe I didnt need it that much after all. I have a 5" F1.5  TTH ,better lock that in the safe.
 Aero Ektars going up in value as well for the moment
 regards
 |  |  
		| Back to top |  |  
		|  |  
		| Dan Fromm 
 
 
 Joined: 14 May 2001
 Posts: 2159
 Location: New Jersey
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2004 11:00 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Re the bidding war, now I know what one of my UK colleagues meant when he remarked "stone the crows" to a surprising, as in he hadn't dreamt of it, solution to a problem. 	  | Quote: |  	  | On 2004-04-03 14:22, ascex wrote:
 I'd better fit mine into a bronica focusing mount then
  ,maybe I didnt need it that much after all. I have a 5" F1.5  TTH ,better lock that in the safe.
 Aero Ektars going up in value as well for the moment
 regards
 
 | 
 
 If your 5"/1.5 is a cine lens, don't waste money on a vault.  Tell us about it, please.
 
 Re selling your 4"/2, well, that was my thought about my former 6"/1.9 (late, coated) Super Six on seeing a 152/1.9 (later, also coated) fetch $US 1,475 on eBay.  If people really want the thing that badly, let them have mine, which I didn't value so highly.  Nipponia-Nippon paid quite a lot for it.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Dan
 |  |  
		| Back to top |  |  
		|  |  
		| ascex 
 
 
 Joined: 27 Mar 2002
 Posts: 22
 Location: united kingdom
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2004 2:42 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| that 5" f1.5 TTH lens is descibed as a projection lens  Xenon gauss design I think, seems sharp at infinity for at least 1/4 plate-its not in great condition though -also it might need a dose of uv  ,its a bit difficult to use as it wont go through the  front standard on the speed,I've quite a few other aerial lenses,(Im working on a camera for the 36" F6.3 wray)- spoils the fun of owning all these old lenses when the become worth something.
 
 regards
 
 |  |  
		| Back to top |  |  
		|  |  
		|  |  
  
	| 
 
 | You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum
 You cannot edit your posts in this forum
 You cannot delete your posts in this forum
 You cannot vote in polls in this forum
 
 |  
 Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
 
 |