View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
84-b
Joined: 09 Dec 2002 Posts: 2 Location: coastal North Carolina
|
Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2002 12:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, I currently own a Horseman 45FA, And I like it, But... What I really want to be able to do is shoot 4x5 / 6x9 hand held. I would want to use a roll film holder for 6x9. (my current enlarger can only handle negs up to 6x9, but I plan on moving up to one that can handle 4x5.) So... I'm looking for help in choosing a camera. Here's what I think I want, Help me if you can.
I want to be able to change lenses. Can I use my current lenses that are mounted in copal and compur shutters? 75mm, 105mm, 90mm, 180mm, 270mm, ect. Can lenses be changed easily? I know little about cams and rangefinders. Which camera is easier to set,adjust and use regarding cams / rangefinders, and changing lenses? If possible, I would like to have perspective control movements. (I mostly use lens rise and forward tilt on the horseman.)
Any opinions, and help you guy's can give me would be great!
Thanks, 84-b |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dan Fromm
Joined: 14 May 2001 Posts: 2120 Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2002 12:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
On 2002-12-09 16:29, 84-b wrote:
Ok, I currently own a Horseman 45FA, And I like it, But... What I really want to be able to do is shoot 4x5 / 6x9 hand held. I would want to use a roll film holder for 6x9. (my current enlarger can only handle negs up to 6x9, but I plan on moving up to one that can handle 4x5.) So... I'm looking for help in choosing a camera. Here's what I think I want, Help me if you can.
I want to be able to change lenses. Can I use my current lenses that are mounted in copal and compur shutters? 75mm, 105mm, 90mm, 180mm, 270mm, ect. Can lenses be changed easily? I know little about cams and rangefinders. Which camera is easier to set,adjust and use regarding cams / rangefinders, and changing lenses? If possible, I would like to have perspective control movements. (I mostly use lens rise and forward tilt on the horseman.)
Any opinions, and help you guy's can give me would be great!
Thanks, 84-b
| If you want forward tilt and a rangefinder that works with several lenses, you might be better off with a 2x3 Horseman that has a rangefinder.
2x3 Graphics don't have forwards tilt, although I understand its possible to reverse the front standard to get it, but this loses backwards tilt. Can't have everything all the time.
Some, not all, of 2x3 Graphics have Kalart rangefinders. No interchangeable cams. As a practical matter, adjusting the finder every time one lens is taken off and another put on is not an option. Graflex' solution was multiple focusing scales on the bed, and the rangefinder set up for one of them. Focus, then set the footage on the correct scale and there you are.
Copal, at least #0 and #1 fit ok, although the #1 will interfere with a Pacemaker's front shutter release. My solution is to take off the bracket that is supposed to snag the shutter's release lever.
Your shorter lenses will work, although putting at least some of them on may require unscrewing the rear cell, putting board, shutter, and front cell on the camera, and then screwing the rear cell on from behind. If I recall correctly, the front standard's throat is ~48 mm across.
Your 270 may be too long to make infinity, not to mention focus closer, on a 2x3 Graphic. Century/Crown maximum extension is ~196 mm, Pacemaker Speed is ~225 mm.
Cheers,
Dan |
|
Back to top |
|
|
84-b
Joined: 09 Dec 2002 Posts: 2 Location: coastal North Carolina
|
Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2002 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dan,
I was wondering about the 4x5 graphics, but would use a 6x9 roll film back on it. Does all that you mentioned in your reply apply to the 4x5 versions as well? thanks, 84-b |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Les
Joined: 09 May 2001 Posts: 2682 Location: Detroit, MI
|
Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2002 6:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well a 4x5 does give you a longer bellows so that's not a problem. Top handle rangefinder do have cams but finding the exact cam for you lenses and getting the rangefinder to match every one will be an expensive an arduous task.
Shooting 6x9 on a 4x5 handheld is overkill. You aren't going to handhold a 270 under any conditions and the normal length 127 and 135 will be a bit on the long side for 6x9, though it can be done. shorter lenses make for easier handholding to a point....the 90mm lens will start to show the bed and one the bed is dropped all of your focus scales get skewed, so it's ground glass time.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dan Fromm
Joined: 14 May 2001 Posts: 2120 Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2002 10:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
On 2002-12-10 09:58, 84-b wrote:
Dan,
I was wondering about the 4x5 graphics, but would use a 6x9 roll film back on it. Does all that you mentioned in your reply apply to the 4x5 versions as well? thanks, 84-b
| Sorry for not catching on. Much as I like Graphics I think you'd better look elsewhere or reconcile yourself to focusing on the ground glass. I didn't mention Linhof Technika (spelling?), should have; my little brother had a 2x3 Linhof 30 years ago, I've always seen my Century as a very poor man's equivalent.
If you want a 4x5 Graphic, a Super's probably your best bet, but as Les pointed out cams might be a problem and they're not light and and and.
Cheers,
Dan |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|