t.r.sanford
Joined: 10 Nov 2003 Posts: 812 Location: East Coast (Long Island)
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 2:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The "classic" portrait cameras had a horizontally swinging back, not a vertical swing. The idea was to seat the subject at a slight angle to the optical axis, so one eye would be a bit closer to the camera than the other. You then swung the back until both eyes came into focus.
You can do this with a "Crown Graphic," of course, by mounting it vertically. As you suggest, swinging the lens does raise the question of coverage.
I think what you're looking for in a lens will be a non-telephoto with fairly large maximum aperture, eight to nine inches in focal length. Such a lens produces an image circle that can cover a 5x7 frame. There have been a great many "Tessar"-formula lenses like this made over the past hundred years.
If you really want horizontal tilts with the camera turned vertically, I agree that another camera is the best way to go. |
|