Graflex.org Forum Index Graflex.org
Get help with your Graflex questions here
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

180mm Zeiss -vs- 180mm Rodenstock

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Graflex.org Forum Index -> Graflex XL Help
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Kodiak



Joined: 16 Sep 2003
Posts: 3
Location: Northport, Alabama, United States

PostPosted: Wed Sep 17, 2003 3:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Does anyone know how the 180mm Rodenstock compares to the 180mm Zeiss Planar? I've found the Rodenstock version to be much cheaper. Cheep!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Les



Joined: 09 May 2001
Posts: 2682
Location: Detroit, MI

PostPosted: Wed Sep 17, 2003 1:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A 180mm planar is a rare item, so it commands a price even if there are sharper lens designs out there.

The Planar design was for speed, but it suffered in coverage and, inuncoated version, contrast.

I"m not sure which Roddenstock your comparing it to.

Les

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jpmose



Joined: 29 May 2001
Posts: 164
Location: Atlanta, GA

PostPosted: Wed Sep 17, 2003 4:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Are you sure this is a Zeiss Planar? As far as I know, the 180mm is a Zeiss Sonnar supplied for a Graflex XL.

I have a lot of data on the large format Linhof select Zeiss lenses as I will be creating a web page on this subject someday. The 180mm Sonnar (same as the 180mm Linhof select Sonnar supplied with Linhof cameras between 1955 and the early 1970's) is an outstanding lens. However, you are paying a premium for it's Zeiss status. The main advantage of this lens is performance at wide apertures. In fact, the Sonnar is known to be equally sharp wide open versus stopped down. I own a Linhof select 250mm Sonnar and find this to be true. If you can afford the premium, I would go with the Sonnar.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Kodiak



Joined: 16 Sep 2003
Posts: 3
Location: Northport, Alabama, United States

PostPosted: Thu Sep 18, 2003 2:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for your answers! And your are right that I mistakenly identified it as a Zeiss Planar, instead of a Sonnar. Sorry. I am continuing to look for either lens. To be honest, it will probably boil down to whichever I can afford at the moment they become available.
PS: The Rodenstock is a Rotelar 180mm/F4.5, I believe, and is a "true" telephoto, whatever that means.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
antjam65



Joined: 27 Dec 2001
Posts: 42
Location: MA, USA

PostPosted: Thu Sep 18, 2003 10:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I find they're both great lenses. I wont dispute whether the Sonnar is sharper at large apertures, I can't really recall using it at wider than about f8 (thinking about, I'd like to try that). The Rotelar is a lot lighter and more complact and is the lens I carry with me when I want a longer lens along. Hence, I've used it a lot more then the Sonnar, which tends to sit in my 'auto-dry' cabinet. The 180mm Rotelar is really excellent - absolutely no complaints. Actually, my sole complaint is only having one of them! I'd like to get one mounted on a board to use on my 2x3 Graphics. Also, like the 58mm Grandagons for the XL, the Rotelars can have separation problems. Thinking about it, mine does have a thin (a few millimeters) crescent of separation around part of the front element (no effect on performance, evidently) and another I bought (to mount on a lens board) arrived with worse separation and I returned it.

In my opinion, you can't go wrong with either lens, but the Rotelar is a lot easier to carry around and handhold, etc.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Les



Joined: 09 May 2001
Posts: 2682
Location: Detroit, MI

PostPosted: Thu Sep 18, 2003 1:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A non tele lens, when focused at infinity, will draw out the bellows equal to the focal length, so a 5" lens will focus infinity 5" away from the film plane.

The same can be said for a 24" lens.....focuses at infinity with 24" of bellows draw.

Tele lenses cheat. By adding a negative element to the rear of a short lens the image gets spread over a larger area. but the Ground Glass didn't get bigger so the effect is magnification.

You end up with a 180mm lens that needs less than 180mm to focus infinity.

So the Rotelar is lighter, brighter, cheaper and won't stick out as far.

The Sonnar is a Zeiss, and is sharp wide open.

I know the Sonnar will cover 4x5. I suspect the Rotelar will, but this is where I suspect you'll see a marked performance improvement with the Sonnar.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Graflex.org Forum Index -> Graflex XL Help All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group