View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
1banjo
Joined: 16 Nov 2008 Posts: 492 Location: kansas
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 12:24 am Post subject: Goerz 30" Artar |
|
|
Goerz 30" Artar on a speed ebad #160670068269 |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
Dan Fromm
Joined: 14 May 2001 Posts: 2120 Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 12:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting. Another way to get the extension. |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
adamgarrickrobins
Joined: 02 Jul 2009 Posts: 38 Location: St. Johns, Oregon
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 4:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It weighs 200 lbs, according to the desciption, but the shipping is only $35 and it has a simple single handle on the top for carrying?
Also, what WOULD one photograph with a 30" focal length? The moon? |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
C. Henry
Joined: 13 Dec 2005 Posts: 360 Location: North East Georgia, USA
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
One would use a 30" lens on the 4" x 5" format to shoot the same things that would call for a 200mm to 300mm lens on the 35mm format.
30"is six times the long way of the 4" x 5" format, 200mm is 5.56 times and 300mm is 8.33 times the long way of the 35mm film format.
C. Henry |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
1banjo
Joined: 16 Nov 2008 Posts: 492 Location: kansas
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 6:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
a peace of that black ABS be easer |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
adamgarrickrobins
Joined: 02 Jul 2009 Posts: 38 Location: St. Johns, Oregon
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 6:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
C. Henry wrote: | One would use a 30" lens on the 4" x 5" format to shoot the same things that would call for a 200mm to 300mm lens on the 35mm format.
30"is six times the long way of the 4" x 5" format, 200mm is 5.56 times and 300mm is 8.33 times the long way of the 35mm film format.
C. Henry |
I see what you're saying. Still, this is not terribly maneuverable. You wouldn't be doing much wildlife photography with something like this. I suppose you could get some cool moon shots, however.
It's still an interesting piece, and I am glad it got posted here. Just another possibility with a Speed Graphic! |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
graphicdave
Joined: 29 May 2007 Posts: 67 Location: Maryland
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
adamgarrickrobins,
I believe you put one too many zero's after the two on the wieght....it's 20lbs instead of 200. ![](images/smiles/icon_lol.gif) |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
Dan Fromm
Joined: 14 May 2001 Posts: 2120 Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 10:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
1banjo wrote: | a peace of that black ABS be easer | Nope, the real point of the box is to support the lens and the camera. A dinky little piece of plastic pipe won't do. |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/subSilver/images/spacer.gif) |
|