View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
mfrissen
Joined: 10 Jun 2004 Posts: 25 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 1:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
I'm contemplating a RH-10 back for my CG45. I'm using an excel sheet to calculate/print the DOF for different ranges. However, I'm always confused with the following:
- if I use a RH-10 back, which is in effect a 6x7 format, should I use the 6x7 CoC (0.06mm) or keep using the 4x5 CoC (0.1mm) to calculate the DOF?
since the distance to film doesn't change.. I think the latter.. but as I said.. I'm always confused with this "CoC" thing (hence the name probably...) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dan Fromm
Joined: 14 May 2001 Posts: 2120 Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 2:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
On 2004-12-06 05:25, mfrissen wrote:
Hi,
I'm contemplating a RH-10 back for my CG45. I'm using an excel sheet to calculate/print the DOF for different ranges. However, I'm always confused with the following:
- if I use a RH-10 back, which is in effect a 6x7 format, should I use the 6x7 CoC (0.06mm) or keep using the 4x5 CoC (0.1mm) to calculate the DOF?
since the distance to film doesn't change.. I think the latter.. but as I said.. I'm always confused with this "CoC" thing (hence the name probably...)
| Use the 6x7 CoC because you'll enlarge 6x7 more than 4x5 to get the same final print size. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
glennfromwy
Joined: 29 Nov 2001 Posts: 903 Location: S.W. Wyoming
|
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2004 8:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yep, circle of confusion. That's me.
_________________ Glenn
"Wyoming - Where everybody is somebody else's weirdo" |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|